I mean Pete's sake, why not? You always hear ranting about how this will happen or we are screwed because of the N.W.O. Its so popular a thing to rally against that you all know what i mean by N.W.O.

Has any one stopped to think about the positive side, ya'no, the perks.

Im glad thats the first question you asked (after the comments about my parentage). Face it, the richest couple of % have been running the whole world anyway. Borders don't mean much to them and even when their countries are at war with each other I have a feeling they are still doing business with each other and just face it war is very big business. Got any idea what an M-16 costs let alone those missiles that are now even on unmanned aircraft.

So if this small group of Rich #$&^%$$#$@$# already work together and run everything why should we not demand they do it under one tent. Universal codes every where you go, my pc will work if I go to Europe and maybe real Asian porn will be in English (my vote for the one world one language thing).

The real beauty is (believe me, if you haven't been to the states you might not understand this) the bigger a Gov. is the less time it has to really do anything. Here if you keep your business on the low you can pretty well do any thing you want anyway. Maybe that is a universal thing. Seems even Iran has a partisan fracture.

Then there is war, sure there will still be guerrilla groups and terrorist cells but aren't there plenty of those now. If there is just one government, one country who do you need an army to fight. Mopping up the terrorists would be a police thing again and that will keep Deputy Fife busy.

Even good politicians go for the dollar on a stick, that probably won't change, but we could have all the middle management and technical stuff handled in Japan and Switzerland.

Ok, now you can sling pooh.

One problem the N.W.O. [bilderbergs]
don't just want 1 government
they also only want 500,000,000 people world wide , out of 6 billion [google american stone hinge]
I know I'm not on their short list..............so I don't like their idea
If I was you I'd see if you are to before you push for their instatement and control
can we say , fefdom and surfdom [spelling , but you get the point]
not my idea of a good time

Considering that twice (or is it thrice?) as many Earthlings speak Mandarin as opposed to English, I'd think that Mandarin would be voted as the world language. Assuming, of course, that this NWO would be a democracy.

Bilderberg had a not so friendly split in '72 over the issue of allowing Japan(Asia) to send a delegation and the Trilateral Commission was born. Money=Power, follow the money, the TC was founded by David Rockefeller and funded by the Kettering and Ford Foundations and has strong ties to the FRB. They publish their notes from the bi-annual meetings in a magazine named the Trialogue and have a website www.trilateral.org their mission statement is on the front page.
While Bilderberg is ultra secretive causing conspiracy theories the TC is pretty open and was formed almost strait out of the membership of bilderburg. Which in my opinion makes the TC much scarier.

To directly answer your question though, no, I highly doubt I make the cut, a mixed breed outlaw who won't yield or bow to any power. (I plan to refuse death to his face). Im exactly the subversive type that they will hunt down first. I think I would last as a Serf about as long as it took to stab the master with a piece of farm equipment.

please remember I was being a bit sarcastic with this thread I in no way support a N.W.O, now I might support a North American Union, ya know, to stay ahead of the EU and China.

I understand that most armed conflicts are not international, but within a single nation. A NWO would not help in this respect.

Also, nowadays, political dissidents can often flee to other countries, even Americans fled to Canada and other nations during the Vietnam war. If we were all one country this would be a bit more difficult to do.

Better find a resistance pocket!

Ever hear of the Georgia Guidestones?

interesting read LaoTzu



to get back to the subject this NWO will not work

that is just my opinion

When I think of NWO I think of many things, among these things I always hear to look out for a Global Currency. Its seems the IMF's sdr's (special drawing rights) can be considered the global currency. 187 countries are a member of the IMF out of I believe 195 total countries? Sdr's I believe can be exchanged for any currency. Not very familiar with the IMF so if I am wrong about anything please let me know,

Does anyone realize what they are asking for with a NWO? It is essentially a form of new anarchy, we would have to completely re-structure the banking, citizenship, government, military, and god knows how many other organizations with a new form of leadership.

If we (speaking to the USA) we're to suddenly become a totalitarian regime, the banking system would collapse, food and fuel supplies would burn up in the blink of an eye, telecommunications would become bottle-necked with floods of information, and not to mention the constant rioting and looting that would ensue because the police and military force would be so disorganized they would be fighting each other.

I have heard all of the conspiracies surrounding the Bilderberg group and all I can say is if they try and instate a new form of control it is going to collapse in their hands faster than a wet sandcastle, no matter how well they plan ahead. The human nature is to survive and sustain by any means necessary, this is why with any hostile takeover there is a small band of resistance fighters who manage to turn the tables and end up restoring order.

Crash, in my humble opinion, it comes done to a matter of power in this country, this is the true power of the American people. If we go along with the plan it would be a nearly seamless transition.

We already have an International Governing body whose home is in our country and which we do most of the funding and pull the biggest load with boots on the ground. We have several different treaty organizations and coalitions where our military basically funds and runs multiple International Armies. The IMF pretty well runs the banking industry now and owns large chunks of almost every nation.

Sell us on a plan and we will deliver it. Our history and our mix of culture has ingrained in us the spirit to rise to the challenge.

Rebellion is our birth right so you are very correct that if it came by force it would not work. Rebellion and independence are spoon fed to us from birth and are so institutionalized in our society they are the corner stones of our Identity.

It would not be a small group of freedom fighters. Sic Semper Tyrannis! Thus always to Tyrants! Its the official motto of Virginia. We are an industrial nation with an abundance of skilled tradesmen who will be able to improvise weapons and once a rebel army has control of some territory, mass produce weapons. The military will split immediately so the rebel forces will have professional soldiers with what ever equipment they take. There is a chance whole pieces of the military would stay intact as they split from the new regime claiming it illegitimate. That would give us leadership and probably an airforce and navy along with an Army and civilian militias (which already exist). Then take into account our military forces abroad and which way they will come down on the issue. They may have to conquer the area they are in and wait it out. Cut off from supply from home they will likely no longer be welcome by their hosts and looked at as a threat.

You cross all that with our near worship of violence and the fragile balance of our food and power delivery here at home and I don't think the situation will build for weeks but will explode on day 1.

This is exactly why we have never had a military coupe or invasion. Its healthy to fear the government but we need to stop believing they are all powerful, they can only do what people will tolerate.

Very true PH8AL, id like to see a section of the military branch off soon , maybe then the people would matter to the gov, besides them being more then a vote. I also agree it would not be a small group of freedom fighters, most people in the US already cant stand the police and such telling them what to do now. Besides the groups of people you mention, America also has what few other countries (IMO) have atleast not to the scale that we have, and that involves the numerous groups, such as hells angels, pagans, bloods, crips, kings, mafia, supremacist groups, ms13, the list goes on and on. From the smallest towns to the biggest cities these organizations exist throughout the US.

It cannot be a complet constrained machine neither an absolute anarchy. The 'Order' Should be tuned, dynamic and adaptive and also coarse grained (not monolitic) , at this pois is not more a NWO but an open society...

to the Darkside, The Real X Men.

I don't think you understand what the original poster was intending. I believe the conversation is referring to the NWO as put forth by conspiracy theorists.

Sorry very sleepy to read all comments but will as well post mine... I see your point ,now see mine/....freemantv.com abovetopsecret,..it's deeper than imagined...

The Boogie Man is coming lol N.W.O.