I first heard of this on the radio, I didn't really think much of it until today. There was something else that they mentioned, that I didn't pay close attention to. If memory serves me correct... They were talking about that the past conflicts involving the "Srebrenic Massacre" wasn't gencide. I believe it was stated by Prime Minister Milorad Dodik, if anyone can provide the audio clip talking about this It would much Appreciated


Apparently the Greeks Helped? (Watch the Video)

Old but some what current

Apparent Media Manipulation

Denial of genocide isn't uncommon, it's an easy sell because it appeals to the conspiracy theorist part of us all....that little doubt in the back of our mind that always wonders if the lone voice in disagreement might be true..... that lone voice that's shouting against a mountain of evidence that we only have other people's word exists.

The problem is the evidence. Evidence is the conspiracy theorists worst enemy, same as it's the denialists worst enemy. 'As of July 2010, 6481 genocide victims have been identified through DNA analysis of body parts recovered from mass graves' General Source Source ICMP ten days ago.

The title of your topic is 'Srebrenic Massacre Wasn' the evidence says that the Srebrenic Massacre very much was. Both your links are citing are arguing the logistics of how many of which troops were where and when, this is completely irrelevent when the DNA from the mass graves shows conclusive evidence of genocide by Bosnian Serb army (Army of Republika Srpska).