QUOTE
Anyway to the point - You may very well be correct, but imagine the implications of everything being defined by numbers. If our thoughts, our dreams, hopes, ambitions, can all be represented in numbers than what are we really? Wouldn't every person be nothing more a complex algorithm? If that is the case where does a God fit into the equation. How about uncertainty. The implications of that kind of knowledge are staggering.
Simply put numbers are endless because we just invent a new name for the numbers as we add them so it is possible to count an infinite number of things even if those things are infinite themselves. Drops of water in the ocean seam endless yet they don't go on forever, but we do not have the math at the level of perception to say exactly how many so we say endless.
Open notepad and place a small weight on the 1 key, each number added moves us one place further from the decimal, how far it can go is limited by your computer not by the number of times you can add another place.
QUOTE
Atoms aren't "little solar systems" they were thought to be. When you delve into the world of the very very small, physics is turned on it's head.
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle
"quantum mechanics cannot give exact results, but only the probabilities for the occurrence of a variety of possible results."
Implications of uncertainty
It's possible that in the future some way will be found to measure things more precisely and this theory will be debunked. However, what may be is not what is.
The key is in the definition of the word uncertainty
QUOTE
uncertainty
Definition
un·cer·tain·ty
[ un súrt'ntee ]
To hear the pronunciation, install Silverlight
un·cer·tain·ties Plural
NOUN
1.
fact of being uncertain: the quality or state of being uncertain
2.
unpredictable thing: something that nobody can predict or guarantee ( often used in the plural )
"economic uncertainties"
Thesaurus
NOUN
Synonyms: doubt, indecision, hesitation, vagueness, ambiguity, insecurity
It seems like chaos because we are not capable of quantifying it and assigning set principals to it. The rules of physics are not being turned on their head and it being random chaos. Just as with geometry before fractal math, we don't have the ability to crunch such huge numbers.
Schrodinger's cat is much the same argument just from a different camp of physics that in the end both camps where getting the same answer by a different route. Something doesn't exist if we don't observe it, much easier said by "if a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound"
In 1926 when this philosophy of physics originated time was believed to be a universal constant.
Heisenberg does not take into account relativity and the role of space/time being relevent to the observer. The uncertainty is that the mass of an electron moves at a different rate through space than its momentum (mass x velocity) can allow (quantum jump) making it impossible to predict, so our physics at our level of perception does not seem to apply because you can precisely track planets but not electrons. No one is quite to the answer yet but it would seem that at that size, mass acts differently against space/time and what they describe as a quantum jump in the electrons orbit is quite possibly the electron folding space time. If that is the case and we figure out the scheme of determining when it will happen and how far it will go it will no longer be uncertain or chaos. When we finally figure out when and how far these jumps will happen it will rock physics on a level of the universe.
Dark matter is how many physicists explain that the weight of the universe being far greater than the amount of matter in it. Universes existing endlessly smaller and larger inside and outside of each other explains this with out having to invent invisible particles. This theory is supported also by fractals which are repeating complex patterns repeating endlessly smaller or larger.
The whole point wraps down to the evolution of our understanding of math, its not that there is no way to quantify anything just that we haven't invented the math yet.
Sorry if this is a bit hard to read, I find physics fascinating and try to keep up but explaining things this complex is not something I am good at.